top of page

Inside the Painting: Lech Majewski’s The Mill and the Cross

11 minutes ago
5 min read

A windmill turns slowly on top of an impossible crag. Below it, peasants wake up, chase a calf, sell bread, argue and make love. Red-coated horsemen ride across a pale field. Somewhere in the crowd a man falls under the weight of a wooden cross, and almost nobody looks.


The Mill and the Cross (2011) © Lech Majewski
The Mill and the Cross (2011) © Lech Majewski

This is the opening world of The Mill and the Cross, a 2011 film by the Polish director Lech Majewski. It does what every museum visitor has quietly wished for in front of a great painting: it lets you step through the frame and walk around.


The painting it lives inside is The Procession to Calvary by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, signed and dated 1564 and now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. The museum calls it the most populous picture Bruegel ever painted. Majewski’s film takes that crowd and gives it breath.


A Book That Became a World


The film started with a book. In 1996 the art historian Michael Francis Gibson published The Mill and the Cross, a long, patient reading of Bruegel’s panel. Gibson later saw Majewski’s earlier film Angelus in Paris and recognised something Bruegel-like in it, so he passed his book to the director. Gibson had imagined a documentary. Majewski offered a feature film instead, and the two wrote the screenplay together.


It was a natural match. Majewski trained at an art academy before he moved to film school in Łódź, and he has said that he “tried to paint in my films.” He also wrote the screenplay for Julian Schnabel’s Basquiat (1996). On The Mill and the Cross he directed, co-produced, shot and even co-wrote the music, which shows how personal the project was.


The Painting Itself


To understand the film, it helps to look closely at what Bruegel actually painted. The Procession to Calvary is about 124 by 170 centimetres, oil on oak, and it holds hundreds of figures. Christ is in the middle of it, fallen under his cross, but he is tiny and easy to miss. He wears no halo. The people around him are busy with their own lives.


The Procession to Calvary
The Procession to Calvary

In the right foreground, on a small rocky shelf, the Virgin Mary faints, held up by Saint John and the other Marys. They are larger than everyone else and are dressed in older, timeless clothes, as if they belong to a different story. On the left, Simon of Cyrene is being forced to help carry the cross while his wife pulls him back. Gallows and execution wheels dot the landscape, and ravens wait nearby.


The Roman soldiers are something else. Bruegel dressed them as the red-coated horsemen who served the Spanish crown in the Low Countries in his own day. One rider carries a faint Habsburg double-headed eagle on his flag. Bruegel was painting Christ’s Passion, but he was also painting Flanders in 1564, a land of religious persecution and foreign troops.


High above it all, on a rock no real miller could ever climb, stands the windmill. Scholars have read it in many ways: as Flanders enduring under Spanish rule, as the turning wheel of the world, or, as Gibson suggested, as the Church built on rock. Whatever it means, the mill is the axle the whole composition turns around.


Building a Moving Painting


Majewski did not just film actors in period costume in a field. He rebuilt Bruegel’s way of seeing.


Bruegel often combined several viewpoints in a single landscape, a world that could never be photographed from one spot. To capture that, Majewski filmed every element separately against a blue or green screen and then layered them together. He told Sight & Sound that each image used at least forty layers, and some used as many as 147. Actors were filmed in Poland, including on the old slag heaps around Katowice. A field was shot near Olsztyn. The clouds were filmed in New Zealand. The windmill on its crag was built by computer after plans for a real one proved too costly and unsafe. Majewski spent around four years putting the film together.


The result is very strange and very beautiful. Spaces feel slightly flattened, like a painted backdrop, while the figures in front of them move with real weight. Light falls the way it falls in a panel painting, soft and even, without the hard shadows of cinema. You are always aware that you are inside a picture.


The Mill and the Cross (2011) © Lech Majewski
The Mill and the Cross (2011) © Lech Majewski

Bruegel at Work


Rutger Hauer plays Bruegel, wandering among his own characters with a sketchbook. In one memorable scene he studies a spider’s web glittering with dew and explains that his painting will work the same way: the key event at the centre, with the busy world spinning around it. Michael York plays Nicolaes Jonghelinck, the wealthy Antwerp collector whose 1566 inventory listed this painting among sixteen Bruegels. Charlotte Rampling plays the grieving Mary, and her quiet monologues give the film its emotional centre.




Dialogue is sparse. Much of the film is a series of small scenes from village life, with almost no words at all. A family wakes. The miller and his workers climb the endless stairs to start the sails. Then the soldiers arrive, and the violence of the age breaks in without warning. The film never hurries, and it asks the viewer to slow down too, the way a good painting does.


The Moment the World Stops


The most famous sequence comes when Bruegel looks up at the miller and gestures. The great sails stop turning, and the whole landscape freezes. Majewski has described this frozen tableau as the original vision behind the whole film: people standing still in a vast meadow while the camera drifts slowly toward them.


It is a simple idea, but it gives the film its quiet philosophy. A painting is time stopped. Bruegel’s real power, the film suggests, is not to show us one moment but to hold it still long enough that we finally notice the small, fallen figure at its centre.


Out of the Frame


The film ends in the gallery in Vienna, with the camera pulling back from the real panel on the museum wall. In a review for RogerEbert.com, critic Jim Emerson found the ending both poignant and unsettling, joking that “museums are where art goes to die.” After ninety minutes of wind, mud and birdsong, the painting looks suddenly sealed off behind its frame.



That is perhaps the film’s lasting gift. The Mill and the Cross premiered at Sundance in January 2011 and won warm reviews, with critics praising its technical daring even when they found the English dialogue stiff. It has never become a household title. Yet anyone who watches it will look at old paintings differently afterwards, not as flat objects, but as crowded worlds full of people whose lives continue just outside our attention.


Next time you stand before a Bruegel, find the windmill. Then find Christ. Notice how long it takes. That delay, Majewski reminds us, is the whole point.

 
 
bottom of page